|
Rumi's Religion of LOVE
(1)
1. Mathnavi,
Rumi’s master piece, begins by telling the story of a flute.
At some level, this flute is a symbol of human being’s soul,
and its sad melody echoes a hidden sadness at the heart of
every human being’s soul who is separated from the source.
For Rumi, the tragedy of human’s existence in this world is
“separation”. We were once united with the Unseen Ocean of
Divine. But now the tiny drop of my existence is fallen in
the desert of this illusionary world, apart from the Ocean.
For Rumi, the authentic life is the one which is united with
the Divine. Therefore, my life, as long as it is separated
from the source, is not authentic.
2. That is why the flute’s melody is passionately sad. It is
sad, because of the pain of nostalgia, being apart from the
home. And it is passionate, because of the desperate longing
for returning to the home, and rejoining the Beloved.
Therefore, for Rumi, at the heart of human’s soul there is a
persistent sense of uneasiness: my soul never feels
comfortable in this world, it always feels something is
missing, it always experiences a sense of “separation
anxiety”. Therefore, the flute’s moaning is a sad song that
your soul sings when she remembers the home, the good old
times.
3. For Rumi, an unauthentic life, i.e., a life of separation
is dominated by two strong feelings: anxiety, and boredom.
The reason is simple: When the drop of my existence is not a
part of the Ocean anymore, its existence can easily be wiped
out. An isolated drop can be easily evaporated by the heat
of the sun, or be dried out by a wind. A separated life is
at the edge of annihilation. And the constant threat of
annihilation is the main source of human’s anxiety. On the
other hand, the situation of human’s soul at the stage of
separation, according to Rumi, is similar to a princess who
used to live in an extremely large palace, but now she is
condemned to live in a very dark small prison with no
windows on the walls. When she lived in the palace, there
was always something new to explore: the vastness of the
sky, the colorful scene of the sunset, the endless horizon
of the ocean. There was no room for boredom. But now she is
restricted to close walls with
no perspective. Nothing new and refreshing comes to the
view. She is bored to the bones. When the drop was united
with the Ocean, it was limitless, but now as a separated
drop, it is trapped into its limited individuality. Here,
the source of boredom is the finite, being restricted to
inescapable limits.
Therefore, for Rumi, there is only one way to truly overcome
the pain of anxiety and boredom in our lives: to attain the
authentic life, to find the way back to the home, to be
reunited with the Ocean. This journey brings to our souls
permanent peace and true happiness.
4. But what is the path to the Ocean? How can human’s soul
find her way back to the source? Rumi believes that this
question cannot be answered unless we know what the
main obstacle on our way back to the Ocean is. So what is
the barrier that prevents us
from rejoining the Ocean, and overcoming the stage of
separation? Rumi’s answer is
simple and straightforward: the obstacle is you, your own
“self”. Rumi tells us the story
of a lover
who went to his beloved, and knocked the door. The beloved
from behind the door asked: “Who is that at the door?” The
lover answered: “I”. The beloved disappointedly said: “Go
away! It is not the proper time! Here is not place for such
a raw fellow!”, and she did not open the door. After several
years reflection, the lover returned and fearfully knocked
the door again. The beloved asked: “Who is that at the
door?” This time the lover responded: “You! The one on this
side of the door is also you!” And it was then that the
beloved opened the door, and said: “Now it is the time!
There is no room in the house for two “I”s. Now since you
have been transformed to me, and nothing left of that “I”,
you may come in.” Rumi’s message is clear: if you want to
rejoin the beloved, you should abandon your “self”. This
“self”, for Rumi, is the situation of human’s existence when
s/he has become separated from the Divine, and it has two
major characteristics: First, from moral point of view, this
“self” is the source of “selfishness” and “egoism”. The
person whose existence evolves around him wants everything
for his own benefit, and cares less for the others. But
secondly and more importantly, this “self” defines itself in
contrast to “others”. Therefore, the essence of “self” is
boundary; some limits that distinguish it from other beings.
Boundary and limit create distance and separation. They
descend “self” from the state of union to the state of
separation. That is why Rumi calls “self” “the mother of all
vices”, and considers it as the main source of anxiety and
boredom.
5. Then how can one cure the sickness of this selfish
limiting “self”? How can
one escape from the prison of this restricting selfishness?
How can our souls flourish like
a flower, or transform like a butterfly? Or more accurately,
how can one alternate the
individual self’s boundaries and contours? It is worth
noting that alternations in
individual self’s boundaries and contours are a goal of
religious quest in general: For
example, in Indian Vedanta the goal of religious quest is to
expand the self to include all
of being, and in Buddhism, it is to eliminate the self, and
in theism merging with the
divine.
For Rumi, the one and only way of this alternation or
transformation is the path of
love. Rumi calls “love” “the Physician for all our
sicknesses”, and more importantly, he
considers “love” as the remedy for pride and conceit, which
are, in his view, the main
sources of all other human’s vices. He strongly encourages
us to fall in love:
| عمر كه بى عشق رفت هيچ حسابش مگير |
آب حيات است عشق در دل و جانش پرير |
| هر كه به جز عاشقان ماهى بى آب دان |
مرده و پژمرده است گر چه بود او وزير |
A lifetime
without Love is of no account. Love is the Water of Life-
drink it down with heart and soul! Know that all but the lovers are fish without water, dead
and desiccated, though they be viziers.(D 11909-10)
| بترين مرگها بى
عشقى است |
بر چه مى لرزد صدف بر گوهرش |
The worst of all
deaths is to be without Love. Why does the oyster tremble?
For its own pearl. (D 13297)
| هر كه را نبض عشق
مىنجهد |
گر فلاطون بود تو اش خـر گير |
If Love’s pulse
does not beat within a man, let him be Plato, he is but an
ass. (D12330)
| عشق گزين، عشق، بى
حيات خوش عشق |
عمر بود بار همچنانكه تو ديدى |
Choose love, love! Without the sweet life of love, living is a
burden- as you have seen. (D 32210)
But why is
“love” the “Physician of all our sicknesses”? For Rumi the
magic of love lies in its ability to alternate the
individual self’s boundaries and contours. The essence of
“love” for Rumi is “sacrifice”. A true lover is the one who
is eager to make great sacrifice for the sake of her/his
beloved. As soon as you experience love, your way of being
transforms drastically. Before love, you knowingly or
unknowingly consider yourself as the measure of everything,
the center of the universe. However, as soon as you fall in
love, the configuration of your “self” will be changed. To
form a love-bond requires you to become open toward the
other, and if necessary, to sacrifice your own well-being
for the sake of the beloved. And this openness alternates
the boundaries of your “self”. The center of your existence
moves from “I” to “beloved”. Rumi sometimes calls this
transformation, “death prior to death” or “death in the
light”. Through love, one finds the opportunity to detach
oneself from one’s own self, and attach it to the beloved.
6. Most Muslim mystics, including Rumi, portrayed the human
love as a “bridge” toward divine love. To experience a true
romantic love, for them, prepares human soul to fly higher,
and find the capacity to love God directly. However, Rumi
sometimes employs a different metaphor that represents his
different understanding of the relation between human and
divine love. Rumi claims that to perceive the soul of the
universe, that is God, one needs two mirrors: one is your
own heart, and the other one is your beloved’s heart. The
lover places his own mirror in front of the beloved’s
mirror. As soon as love’s bond forms, these two mirrors
reflect each other endlessly. The infinite reveals himself
in the space between the two mirrors. The difference between
the mirror- metaphor and the bridge- metaphor is important:
when you cross the bridge, and reach the other side, you do
not need the bridge any more. However, the perception of the
infinite is entirely dependent on the presence of both
mirrors. In other words, in bridge -metaphor, human love has
only instrumental value, when you reach God, your earthly
beloved does not matter anymore, but in mirror-analogy,
human love has intrinsic value, and you can perceive the
holy only through your beloved. God reveals Himself in the
space between two human beings. As many Muslim Sufis
claimed: The path toward God passes through the care for
fellow human beings.
Therefore, love is not only the great teacher of altruism,
but also it shakes the boundaries of “self”, and creates a
unique opportunity to perceive the holy through your
beloved.
That is why Rumi invites us to go beyond the limits of this
or that religion, and devote ourselves to what he calls “the
religion of love”. The religion of love for Rumi is not the
negation of this or that religion, but it is the higher
level of spirituality. This ideais deeply rooted in Rumi’s
personal experience of love. Before he met Shams, Rumi was
to a large extent, a man of traditional religion. For a man
of religion, religion is the center of the world of
spirituality. Salvation cannot be attained but through a
particularreligion. But after meeting Shams, Rumi became a
man of God. For a man of God, there is no fundamental
difference between this or that particular religion, as long
as they lead you to God. Rumi’s personal experience of love
was a turning point in his theology, a kind of “Copernican
Revolution”. For a man of God, it is God and not any
particular religion that is the center of the spiritual
world. The goal is to encounter God beyond any veil,
including the veil of religion. That is why Rumi considered
himself as a follower of
the “religion of love”:
| دين من از عشق
زنده بودن است |
زندگى زين جان و تن ننگ من است |
| |
مثنوى دفتر ششم ۴۰۵۹ |
My religion is to live through love- life through this spirit
and body is my shame.
And he claims that the religion of love is different and beyond all other religions,
it is all about God and nothing else:
| ملت عشق از همه دين
ها جداست |
عاشقان را ملت و مذهب خداست |
| |
مثنوى دفتر دوّم ۱۷۶۰ |
Love’s creed is separate from all religions: The creed and
denomination of lovers is God.
7.
Finally, for
Rumi, same as Plato, love is a response to beauty. The lover
must be sensitive to all kinds of beauty in the world. Rumi
says in his religion if you want to know God, do not look at
this or that book, look at the beauty of the beloved:
| عاشقان را شد مدرس
حسن دوست |
دفتر و درس و سبق شان روى اوست |
| |
مثنوى دفتر
سوّم ۳۸۴۷ |
The lovers’ teacher is the Beloved’s beauty: Their book and
lesson are His face.
The beauty that
inspires love, the openness that comes with love, and also
the perspective of reunion with the beloved are elements in
Rumi’s religion of love that relieve the burden of
“separation”, and help human soul to overcome the persistent
sense of anxiety and boredom. Rumi’s response to the tragedy
of human’s predicament in this world is nothing but the same
universal message of love: to love and to be loved.
1) This paper was presented at “Rumi’s
800 Birthday Celebration” at University of Southern
California (USC) on Feb. 10, 2008.
|